HK’s pan democrats will continue to struggle as long as voters see them as out of touch with our current political landscape

Published: 
Justin Wong
Listen to this article

The camp is blaming its potential allies for its defeat in the recent LegCo by-election; in reality, it needs to be looking at his own mistakes

Justin Wong |
Published: 
Comment

Latest Articles

Improving concentration and relaxation is a walk in the park – with a dog

Climate change, urbanisation lead to early flowering of cherry blossom trees

Tatler to give fans 50% ticket refund for Messi’s Hong Kong no-show by May

An intense smell from a rare corpse flower attracts visitors in San Francisco

Hong Kong grocery chain DCH goes out of business after 39 years

Hong Kong logs coldest start to March since 2016

Last month’s by-election candidates (from left) Ng Dick-hay, Judy Tzeng Li-wen, Lee Cheuk-yan, a moderator, Frederick Fung Kin-kee, and Chan Hoi-yan battled at a forum at Radio Television Hong Kong.

It has been yet another bad month for Hong Kong’s pan democrats.

In the Kowloon West by-election last month, they failed to regain the seat they lost during 2016’s oath-taking controversy – and it was a very embarrassing defeat.

Two pan democrats ran in the by-election: Frederick Fung Kin-kee and Lee Cheuk-yan. Many claimed that Fung only ran to take votes away from Lee and help “independent” candidate and eventual victor Rebecca Chan Hoi-yan. But it turned out Chan didn’t need Lee’s help, because she still received nearly 1,000 more votes than Fung and Lee combined.

How legalising drugs can benefit HK, from lowering the crime rate to starting conversations about addiction and stigma

Party bosses are now trying to figure out why the camp suffered two straight electoral defeats in a constituency where they once held a majority.

Audrey Eu Yuet-mee, leader of the Civic Party, said in a radio interview last Thursday that the loss was due to lack of support from localists. Localists, like the pan-democrats, oppose the current government, but they believe in focusing solely on the welfare of Hongkongers rather than advocating democracy throughout China. Despite calls for the two groups to cooperate, this doesn’t always happen.

However, on this occasion, Eu’s blame was misplaced. Statistics from the Electoral Affairs Commission showed that pan-democrats received strong support in electorates that are known to be localist strongholds. In fact, the number of votes for Lee in areas such as Nam Cheong North, Nam Cheong South, and Cheung Sha Wan were higher than the average for the whole constituency.

How Hong Kong’s progressivism is flawed

Indeed, the localist vote should be the least of the pan-democrats’ problems, as the figures also showed that the camp is struggling when it comes to its traditionally strongest demographic: the middle class. Even though Lee won a number of electorates mainly comprised of middle class voters, like those in Lai Chi Kok and Mei Foo, the margin between him and Chan was very slim. In a couple of cases, Lee only beat Chan by about 300 votes.

The pan-democrats need to stop blaming localists and realise the fact is that voters see them as out of touch with the current political reality. They disagree with the camp’s stance on controversial infrastructure and political system reforms, and their approach to Chinese immigration.

While the pan-democrats may claim to have unity for now, the camp is a sinking ship, with no sense of direction, and is ordering its guns to fire at all allied ships. Unless something changes, the ship is going down without a fight.

Edited by Charlotte Ames-Ettridge

Sign up for the YP Teachers Newsletter
Get updates for teachers sent directly to your inbox
By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy
Comment