[Review] Tre! limps to the finishing line

Published: 
By Candace Kwan
Listen to this article
By Candace Kwan |
Published: 
Comment

Latest Articles

Faithful phrases: 9 idioms that will surely add a pious twist to your writing

Companion dogs comfort Hong Kong’s seniors through new programme

Taylor Swift’s storytelling shines in The Tortured Poets Department

Glowing animals go much further back in time than we thought

SOTY 2022/23: Art runs in the family for Visual Artist second runner-up

SOTY 2022/23: Linguist (English) first runner-up loves to play devil’s advocate

It may be hard to believe that Green Day have been around since 1987 (yeah, there's a good chance the band is older than you), but they're still going strong. The third instalment of their Uno!, Dos! and Tre! trilogy shows how diverse Green Day's approach to music can be. Billie Joe Armstrong told Rolling Stone it would be epic ... and indeed it is.

Tre! is stadium-worthy for sure, but it's hard to enjoy out of context. The contrast between Tre! and its predecessors is huge; the album simply isn't that good on its own. It's weird that their strength is also their weakness: the albums form a cohesive unit, but almost boringly so.

Tre! is tied together by a seemingly endless series of stadium-bound songs, which would surely sound better live with a horde of screaming fans. Unfortunately, you probably won't walk away with any tunes stuck in your head, except maybe Amanda, a hidden gem that packs a two-minute, 28-second punch.

Still, Tre! is worth checking out, for Green Day's stellar technical prowess if nothing else.

YP Rating: 3/5


 

Your Rating:

 
<!--//--><![CDATA[// ><!-- PDRTJS_settings_6571049 = { "id" : "6571049", "unique_id" : "default", "title" : "", "permalink" : "" }; //--><!]]>
Sign up for the YP Teachers Newsletter
Get updates for teachers sent directly to your inbox
By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy
Comment