Is HK really a great place to live?

Published: 
Wong Yat-hei
Listen to this article

St Mark's and True Light Middle School debate how the city stacks up as a home

Wong Yat-hei |
Published: 
Comment

Latest Articles

Companion dogs comfort Hong Kong’s seniors through new programme

Taylor Swift’s storytelling shines in The Tortured Poets Department

Glowing animals go much further back in time than we thought

SOTY 2022/23: Art runs in the family for Visual Artist second runner-up

SOTY 2022/23: Linguist (English) first runner-up loves to play devil’s advocate

Hong Kong children are taller and heavier over the last 30 years

St Mark's student Katie Or raises an issue during the Nesta-SCMP Debating Competition at St Mark's School in Shau Kei Wan. Katie was named the debate's best speaker.


Hong Kong's virtues as a great place to live were up for debate last Thursday when St Mark's School and True Light Middle School met in the second round of the Nesta-SCMP Debating Competition.

Speaking for the motion "Hong Kong is a great place to live", the team from True Light painted a rosy picture of the city, saying it was one of the world's safest places.

They said Hong Kong was a stable place socially, economically and politically.

St Mark's countered by saying that Hong Kong had a serious pollution problem and a huge income gap.

They said economic growth in Hong Kong only benefited a small portion of the population. With property prices soaring, a lot of people lived in poor, congested conditions.

"It is true that Hong Kong has one of the world's freest economies but only the tycoons are enjoying the results of economic growth," St Mark's Form Three student Gordon Lee Mang-hei said.

St Mark's attacked their opponents for only listing the city's advantages and for failing to come up with a standard indicator to show how living in Hong Kong was great.

They backed up their negative position by pointing out that Hong Kong had a low ranking on the global happiness index.

They also said statistics indicated that one in seven people living in Hong Kong were unhappy, suggesting that the city was not a great place to live.

True Light responded to the pollution point by saying the government had taken action by introducing minibuses and taxis fuelled by liquefied petroleum gas to help ease the problem.

But the True Light speakers failed to effectively address the income inequality point, which eventually led to their defeat.

King Ling College teacher Bonnie Ma was the adjudicator for the debate.

Ma praised both teams for their effort to research and find relevant examples to support their arguments.

But Ma said both True Light and St Mark's failed to use their rebuttals to attack the main arguments of the opposing team.

Ma also advised the debaters to speak more slowly.

The first speaker for St Mark's, Form Two student Katy Or, was named the best speaker of the event.

The contest is in its 13th season and organised by the Native English Speaking Teachers' Association and the South China Morning Post.

Sign up for the YP Teachers Newsletter
Get updates for teachers sent directly to your inbox
By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy
Comment